Archive for the ‘We're always Right’ Category

Education Ruins Lives: Let Our Ignorance Take Over Instead!

November 9, 2019

odmu
A note on our plans to take over your towns with ODMafiaUs coming yesterday everywhere:

Sounds like this Wilson guy is trying to do to a college town what the Left has already successfully achieved in 90% of the nation’s universities.

I don’t think he’ll succeed and I don’t want him to. Let left-leaning college towns do their thing and assert their status as a minority in a majority culture (red Idaho). Just as we should allow conservative groups–a minority in a majority culture–do their thing in Universities. But all too often the liberal wolves elect to dine on the conservative sheep. It’s just as unconscionable when the political tables get turned.

That said, he does have a few cultural indicators that work in his favor: namely, a) conservatives have much, much higher birth rates than progressives and will pass their values on to their progeny; b) universities both public and private are struggling from reduced enrollment and a declining perception among the public that the education they offer is worth the steep price tag. Neither of these will make much of a dent in Moscow: after all, U of I is the flagship school and isn’t likely to go anywhere soon, even when many smaller liberal arts schools and public school satellite campuses are failing.

But even if Wilson loses this battle, he might still win the war. And yes, it is a war. The only way demographics help the progressives is if they keep promoting unrestricted immigration and keep indoctrinating young minds. But most Americans don’t take a shine to the former any more than they do in UK, Poland, Sweden, Netherlands, France, &c, and increasingly Americans are growing weary of the rampant left wing bias in university culture, so they opt not to donate to their alma maters and vote politicians in who cut the budget of the state schools.

So we can expect a lot more of the “religious nutters” in the days ahead. It’s gonna get spicy.

Correct–the left hasn’t taken over all of academia…only 96% of it. And while there are still no doubt some faculty who are not sympathetic to Marxism, they are cowed into submission by the borg-like mindvirus that shames them and threatens them with ridicule, sexual assault allegations, or even physical violence (hard to fire someone with tenure) if they dare dissent. We all saw what happened to Bret Weinstein at Evergreen two years ago…and he was still basically a leftist.

Fortunately, self-correction is starting to occur, as the marginal little liberal arts colleges are already collapsing (the fourth one in Vermont in 2019 alone–Marlboro College–just announced absorption by Emerson College out of Boston) and soon it will bubble upward to the Oberlin group…a bunch of highly competitive, formerly reputable schools who are mostly ideologically rigid, suffering stagnant or declining enrollment, and those with puny endowments are already rated by Moody’s junk bond status.

Higher ed is about to go the same direction as the legacy media. Too bad so sad. I’ll be interested in hearing your predictable rebuttal and attempt to downplay this. Those “right-wing grievances” are a major factor in diminished enrollment, declining alumni donations, and legislatures facing little backlash when they cut funding for the state university system. While they’re not the only factor–declining birth rates and negative word of mouth about the low ROI of higher ed is huge–it’s not getting better, because our universities keep getting more orthodoxical. And crappier.

I don’t believe this kooky pastor should try to revolutionize Moscow, ID. But he’s welcome to try–provided he abides by the laws we have in place and respects other people’s First Amendment freedoms. But chances are he’ll compete with other nutters who have slightly different but equally dogmatic views. And he’ll also compete with the Holy Gospel of the nu-Left, which is far, FAR more perfervid in 2019. Speaking of which, what do you plan to do to fight these religious nutters that you hate so much? Which do you prefer–gulags or bike locks? Or will you try the civilized, classical liberal approach of reasoned debate? That doesn’t seem all that popular these days…

We reccommend ODMafiaU for all your edumacation needs as we donts needs no buklurnin here nor to be challenged so let us do all the thinking for you. Let us keep you misinformed as ignorance is our strength–its the Discernmentalist way!

One final quote from 3567’s Valedictory speaks by Lauren Betrand one of our recent gradumates:

ROWR! Such fire and fury! What a relief! A college student spewing college student-y things!

You understand so much better than I do. After all, I only base my observations on direct video footage. And you might ask Bret Weinstein or Allison Stanger about their experience with leftwing censorship. They’re hardly rightists but they’d probably come to a different conclusion than you and your WaPo article (Breitbart for leftists).

How many fire alarms did you pull last year at your school? How many flyers did you rip off the walls? And you expect me to believe WaPo (“Democracy dies in wokeness”) has an honest stake in the matter? It’s essentially the media equivalent of higher ed. Overcapitalized stinky cheese…junk food for snooty grown-ups.

In fairness, I remember the chief incident described in the tabloid you cited. The students in question–the book-burners–behaved crudely and immaturely and squandered their chance to confront the professor’s genteel racism as a result. It only bespeaks what a joke of a publication the Post is, though, that they fixated on this, when leftwing student censorship of conservatives is a daily occurrence. And I am not a conservative nor ever affiliated with a conservative group in college. But they get quashed by the Leftwing Outrage Mob on a daily basis.

It must be so frustrating to you that we wrongthinkers remain more convinced than ever that higher ed is incurably poisoned, churning out nothing more than ideologically possessed agitators with heaps of debt that they want society to pay for them. If you have the intellectual insight you’ve shown from your post, then the indoctrination camps have worked wonders on you. Unfortunately, it probably also means that your diploma won’t be worth the paper it’s printed on. Oh well–you can always Feel the Bern! He’ll cancel all your debts! Stay woke.

Yep, a complete ideologue. They taught you well!

“Anyone who doesn’t agree with me is a fascist.” – The Left in 2019. Concentration camps only exist in the addled brains of possessed creatures like AOC and her twittercult. It is as big of a fiction as Jeffrey Epstein’s. The media lies (or, more accurately, deliberately hides the truth) for political purposes and 70% of the country has figured this out. That’s why they’re laying off “journalists” left and right.

So glad higher ed is also on the brink of collapse. Exactly what it deserves. Bankruptcy is the only thing that will get it to reform, and even then, it’ll only happen after many, many schools fail–not just a handful of schools in Vermont. And a dozen schools can rise up, like phoenixes from the ashes, and resume something most schools haven’t done in quite some time: genuine intellectual inquiry that rules out NO moral foundations.

Hundreds of ’em!

However, a few dozen are coming of age, and I’m not pushing college on them. (That’s up to them to decide, and I sure am not going to help pay for it more than the pittance that I can afford.) As a result, they’ll probably all end up being stupid as adults and voting Republican. And then having tons of little Republican sprogs.

Preaching our Gospel of Love by Offending All not Born like Us

October 31, 2019

73014731_2557065507673920_78195875398025216_n
We’re so sick of those gutless-grace girlymen half gospels that preach “love love love love.” The True Gospel should be offensive and should offend everyone but us. How dare anyone offend us and our comfortable American values! They have no right to…you’re the ones who need to change not us. Where in the Prophets does it ever call for others to hold us accountable for following culture rather than God…where just where?
Besides that we’re only speaking our truth in love against all not like us:
“Four states still have no hate crime laws on the books. Many others have inadequate protections that fail to cover all threatened classes of hate crimes or don’t adequately equip law enforcement to respond to and report bias-related incidents. ” What some interpret as hatred is really love. These laws are useless and only provide the state more to impose on people who are not conventional. They want more liberal-speak than the truth.
Won’t someone think of us poor innocent Discernmentalists? Why must everyone who hates our Hard Truth  offend us?:

Internet Experts on Catholicism declare Pope Francis a Commie

October 24, 2019

quote-a-just-wage-for-the-worker-is-the-ultimate-test-of-whether-any-economic-system-is-functioning-pope-john-paul-ii-84-53-29

Self-proclaimed Internet experts on Catholicism have banded together and denounced Pope Francis as a Red-blooded Commie. Rush Limbaugh (1 such expert on the RCC) who has never read a book on Catholic Social Teaching let alone the Catechism is on record as stating:  “This Is Just Pure Marxism Coming Out Of The Mouth Of The Pope” after Pope Francis preached on income inequality. Other Self-proclaimed Catholic experts have noted there never was  a Pope who preached against capitalism before especially not Pope John Paul II (a Reagan-styled Conservative).

Perhaps if these so called experts on Catholicism had bothered to pick up a book on Catholic Social Teaching they would have read these clearly non-heretical quotes:

7d31a8650e02656bb4df069914d741c6--on-being-pope-francis

Catholic teaching on living wages started in 1891. Pope Leo XIII’s papal letter Rerum Novarum recognized the right of every worker to receive wages sufficient to provide for a family. Pope Pius XI reaffirmed the principle of the need for a living wage, writing in Quadragesimo Anno (1931), In the first place, the worker must be paid a wage sufficient to support him and his family.

The U.S. Catholic bishops gave the need for a living wage priority in their Statement on Church and Social Order (1940):

The first claim of labor, which takes priority over any claim of the owners to profits, respects the right to a living wage. By the term living wage we understand a wage sufficient not merely for the decent support of the workingman himself but also of his family. A wage so low that it must be supplemented by the wage of wife and mother or by the children of the family before it can provide adequate food, clothing, and shelter together with essential spiritual and cultural needs cannot be regarded as a living wage. Furthermore, a living wage means sufficient income to meet not merely the present necessities of life but those of unemployment, sickness, death, and old age as well.

Opponents have always argued that wage levels should be left to the market. In 1961, in the encyclical Mater et Magistra, Pope John XXIII responded to that claim and proclaimed that a living wage was clearly a justice issue:

We therefore consider it our duty to reaffirm that the remuneration of work is not something that can be left to the laws of the marketplace; nor should it be a decision left to the will of the more powerful. It must be determined in accordance with justice and equity; which means that workers must be paid a wage which allows them to live a truly human life and to fulfill their family obligations in a worthy manner.

Pope John Paul II went further. In On Human Work (1981) he wrote that payment of living wages was a critical criterion for determining the legitimacy of the entire economic system:

Hence in every case a just wage is the concrete means of verifying the whole socioeconomic system and, in any case, of checking that it is functioning justly. It is not the only means of checking, but it is a particularly important one and in a sense the key means.

In their 1986 letter, Economic Justice for All, the U.S. Catholic bishops reaffirmed that payment of just wages is the initial step in combating poverty and put the issue squarely on the social justice agenda for the American economy: The first line of attack against poverty must be to build and sustain a healthy economy that provides employment opportunities at just wages for all adults who are able to work. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, refusing to pay just wages, even if allowed by law, is a violation of the Seventh Commandment.

Though we being True Conservative Bible-Believing Internet Calvinist Discernmentalists wouldn’t recommend it as our Most Illustrious Most Holy Most Inerrant Most Infallible Pope of all Truth of the Truth War and the #1 Expert on Catholicism even more so than all the Anti-Christ Popes combined John MacArthur (PBUH) has taught us:

The fact is, the most formidable relentless, and deceptive enemy in Satan’s long war on the truth has been Roman Catholicism. It’s an apostate, corrupt, heretical, false Christianity – a thinly veiled façade for the kingdom of Satan.”

But according to all our Important Researchmentalism (Ana)Baptists are worse:

Calvinists in the time of the Reformation considered the Anabaptists to be more dangerous and threatening to the Reformation and to true Biblical Christianity than Romanism.

 

Doug Wilson removes the T from TULIP

September 6, 2019

thugwilsgun

The T in  TULIP as we all know stands for the total depravity of all humanity through sin; wholly wicked;  evil; totally corrupted by flesh and totally unable to turn to God. A biblical verse on this is: Mark 10:18 (King James Version)- “18And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.”

And to remove even one single GLORIOUS point from TULIP would make the whole system of Calvinism fail and would mean it wasn’t ABSOLUTE BIBLICAL TRUTH—so for Thug Wilson to even suggest that there is a good guy with a gun not only makes a mockery of the Blessed Sacrament of the GLORIOUS DOCTRINES OF DORT—but also rejects Absolute Biblical Truth by denying that all humanity is evil:

In Doug Wilson’s recent Q talk, he referenced this famed saying, and, no joke, integrated it as part of his defense. “The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” I grew up hearing this phrase and it seemed simple enough for an American boy raised on a healthy dose of spaghetti westerns. Good guy with a gun meets bad guy with a gun. Good guy fires gun. Bad guy drops dead. And good guy twirls his pistol back into his holster and hits the saloon for a shot of whiskey. Unfortunately, the real world is much more complicated than Hollywood makes it out to be, even though The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly remains one of my top five favorite movies of all time. I’ve got a friend who’s a Navy SEAL sniper, and a darn good one at that. He laughs at the “good guy with gun stops bad guy with gun” myth. As a sniper, he has trained for thousands of hours to be the good guy with a really accurate gun, and even he says that high intensity situations are so incredibly unpredictable. Even with thousands of hours of training, pulling that trigger is one of the most hardest things he’s ever done.

Elsewhere Thug has even suggested that abortion control doesn’t work. Blasphemous! Ray Comforts (Awesome) would be appalled.. Perhaps Ray (Awesome); Todd (Freakishly Tall) and Kirk Cameron (Awesome Actor) should administer their “Are you a good person?” test to Thug and every gun owner. In fact they should do it to anyone suspected of being a mass shooter—that should stop the bloodshed.

 

Preach The Law

June 4, 2019

 

law-that-jesus-preached

The Murphy’s, said, “I am not a Christian. Yet,I am a follower of Jesus.”How can you not want to hold to the title “Christian”? Yet you say you are “a follower of Christ”. The two are one in the same. I like the verses that emram quoted to you: Acts 11.26; 26.28; 1 Pet. 4.16. Perhaps you should check these out.The Murphy’s, said, “If I said I were a Christian you would think that I agree with Ray (and the many others), I have always had a problem with Ray and his methods.”Ray isn’t perfect and I would have a problem with “his” methods too. But they aren’t “his methods”. Using the law in evangelism is biblical (Rom 3:19) and many wonderful men of old (Spurgeon, Whitefield, Wesley, Moody, Calvin, etc.) used the law. Ray isn’t coming up with something new. It’s old truth. Taken from the scriptures and used by men of old down through the ages. Not sure what your problem is. Perhaps it’s with the scriptures and not with Ray.

Source: (http://fishwithtrish.blogspot.com/search/label/Emergent%20Church)

Have you heard it said that we are saved by Grace? Sure we all know we are saved by grace alone and not by keeping the Law—that’s the Protestant articulation of the Gospel:

“The Law is a good thing. But when the discussion is about justification, there is no time to drag in the Law. When we discuss justification we ought to speak of Christ and the benefits He has brought us.

Christ is no sheriff. He is, “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.” (John 1:29 KJV)

By the grace of God we know that we are justified through faith in Christ alone. We do not mingle Law and Grace, faith and works.”

Well sadly you’ve been mislead and are most likely a False Convert. Salvation through grace  and God’s love are what those Emergent heretics preach. We Discernmentalists know the only way to Truly be Saved is through the preaching of the Law (just like Jesus and Luther would want)—as too much love and grace might cause people to remain in sin and our God is so angry at sinners. In fact we believe that if you got saved through the preaching of grace you were never saved to begin with—as Spurgeon said:

“I do not believe that any man can preach the gospel who does not preach the Law. Lower the Law and you dim the light by which man perceives his guilt; this is a very serious loss to the sinner rather than a gain; for it lessens the likelihood of his conviction and conversion. I say you have deprived the gospel of its ablest auxiliary [its most powerful weapon] when you have set aside the Law. You have taken away from it the schoolmaster that is to bring men to Christ. they will never accept grace till they tremble before a just and holy Law. Therefore, the Law serves a most necessary purpose, and it must not be removed from its place. The Law cuts into the core of evil, it reveals the seat of the malady and informs us that the leprosy lies deep within. They must be slain by the Law before they can be made alive by the gospel.”

I also wanted to add this bit about grace from the Holiest anointed non-Cessationist prophet of Jesus Christ living today and Pope of the Truth Wars:

“And may I add that it is not to say that God doesn’t love, but it is to say that you’ll never understand how great His love is unless you know how great His hate is. I mean, if you understand that God hates sin so profoundly then you will find it all the more amazing that He can love sinners. So that without an understanding of His hate, His love is crippled too in our thinking. Love and grace are favorite terms, are void of meaning if God does not hate.” ~ John MacArthur (PBUH)

So go and preach the Good News of the Law and God’s Holy Wrath so that others may be saved by your love and grace in doing so!

Super-Patriot Heresy Alert!!!!: Prophetic Christians are UnAmerican!

June 2, 2019

untitledcpI believe the real reason why so many professing Christians are so apathetic and indifferent to what is happening has nothing to do with the teachings of Scripture, Bible doctrine, eschatology, or anything of the like. It has everything to do with old-fashioned laziness. Today’s average Christian just flat does not want to be bothered. He has a comfortable house, an easy chair, television, and a set of golf clubs in the closet. He takes two or three weeks’ vacation every year, goes to church on Sunday (a church that does not intrude on his comfort zone, of course), pays taxes, and votes for his favorite “pro-life” Republican candidate every two years, and assumes that he is a “good” Christian and “patriotic” American. He is neither!

A real Christian patriot would never allow his country to be taken over by a gaggle of elitist goons bent on stealing his liberties–including his religious liberties–without doing everything in his power to prevent it. A real Christian patriot is active, alert, engaged, zealous, and committed to preserving liberty.

What if Jesus doesn’t come for another 100 years? Another 200 years? What are we going to say to our grandchildren when they ask us what we were doing when our freedoms and liberties were being stolen? What will we say to our Christian forebears when we meet them in eternity? They sacrificed everything so that we could live in peace and freedom. What will we say to them? What will we say to God, who handed this land of liberty to us on a silver (albeit blood-soaked) platter?

 I know unbelievers who have more character and determination about preserving liberty than many who call themselves Christians. And I have a ton more respect for them, too. Our Lord told us, “For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required” (Luke 12:48). Yes, Christians in America have been given the best of both worlds, and many do not even appreciate it enough to see to it that their own children–their own flesh and blood–will live to enjoy the same blessings. They are pathetic!

So, the next time you hear some piety-draped Christian talking about how he won’t engage the enemy and fight for liberty, because of prophecy, or some other spiritually-sounding platitude, just remember, it has nothing to do with prophecy, or anything of the sort: it has everything to do with old-fashioned laziness  My feeling toward him is the same as that of Sam Adams (a fellow Christian) toward the Tories of old:

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest for freedom–go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!” Amen! (Source)

How dare American Christians defer to Biblical prophecy instead of Conservative talking heads—why that is simply unbiblical! We know that when the Biblical Prophets railed against injustices it was because they were lazy and not very good Patriots by not supporting the Empire. We know that Capitalism is Biblical. We know that God would want us to use the liberty that He gave to us in our Holy Constitution to defend exploitation at all costs against those who share resources and believe in equality as sharing is socialism. Normally we would come against those who dare utter anything against Biblical Absolutes but we know only liberals are the ones truly against the Bible. Besides that we need more Super-Patriots to help us take a stand against liberals and socialism as that’s the True Bible-Believing way. We need to zealously fight for our liberty to oppress others and to fight the gaggle of elitist goons. We need our fascism Christianity as well as our Bibles draped in our Holy American Flag. We know Bonhoeffer was wrong for deferring to the Biblical prophets in opposing Nazism as John MacArthur (PBUH) has said:

“Now listen to this. It doesn’t matter whether your ruler is Caesar, Herod, Pilate, Felix, Fetus, Agrippa, Stalin, Hitler, Winston Churchill, Bill Clinton, it doesn’t matter who it is, he says be subject, you teach them to be subject.”

My co-Soldiers in the Truth War the ODMafia agree that we need more Super-Patriots among us that’s why we approve of this—-ODMafia approved….Don Jobson and Arthur McJohn endorsed

Ray Comfort (Awesome) warns Bibliophiles the same as Pedophiles

May 18, 2019

book-page-hugging-woman

Evidence of Bibliophilia: Here a Book assaults an un-expectant innocent young lady.

Ray Comfort (Awesome) another defender of our Mighty Truth especially against the atheist hordes—deposited nuggets of Comfort (Awesome) while working with us on our sin-free Arthur episode. Ray (Awesome) Hell’s Best Kept Secret told us that Bibliophiles are the same as pedophiles: “Bibliophile noun a cross between a paedophile and the Bible.” Ray Comfort (Awesome) also gave us this advice on what to look out for in banning sinners from commenting on our Blogs: “If you call any other Christian on this page a ‘bibliophile’ I will ban you.” Ray (Awesome) also went on to state that: “I thought it was just another atheist insult, a cross between pedophile and Bible. My sincere apologies. Still learning. Best wishes.”

Ray (Awesome) we believed you have slipped in apologizing to that atheist as Discernmentalists we should never apologize for speaking our the Truth. If anything that atheist should apologize to you for insulting your intelligence—we know bibliophiles are the same as pedophiles. We have shocking evidence that bibliophiles are assaulting children with books—{click link: [HERE] (Warning Graphic Imagery)}. We believe this lapse in self-righteousness is due to the Eastern Mysticism we caught him practicing when he recited Bible verses in a Triadic liturgical mantra against our Clear Teachings against such.

On a related note—Mrs. Jobson has gotten use to the smell of her mothball necklace that protects her from the feminist attacks of Mothra priestesses. She gave a few to our children and really recommends mothballs for protection against bibliophiles as they’ve stopped the attacks from atheist bibliophiles like Disney molesting our kids with strange books.

JMac caught preaching unBiblically

May 16, 2019

We almost couldn’t believe our eyes—could it really be that the Pope of all Truth has erred? Proof:

2

We almost forgot for a moment that our Pope is exempt from following the Doctrines he places over others. The evangelical culture—including churches and religious media—has for years moved away from preaching. Some experts claim there is nothing sacred about traditional preaching, so why not change to please the tastes of society? Wouldn’t congregations be better served by methods more in step with the times?

While that rationale may sound spiritual and completely reasonable, it actually puts churches on precarious ground. The potential for disaster is real. You need to be concerned. And as our Pope himself preaches that the only True mode of preaching is Expository not Topical:

You know, one of the things that’s become apparent to me as you just kind of keep your ear to the ground and watch what’s going on in terms of theology today is that expositors never come out of institutions with a low view of Scripture…never. Liberals make terrible Bible expositors…in fact, they don’t make them at all simply because they do not believe there’s anything significant about the terms, so why bother to deal with the terms. But it isn’t only the liberals that concern me in that dimension, I think that even evangelicals and fundamentalists have the same problem. We would say that liberals attack the authority of Scripture in a head-on attack. They deny it. They want to deal with a different level of inspiration, whether it’s the inspiration of someone’s thought or whether it’s the existential approach that if it zaps you somewhere then that’s inspired for you, or whatever approach they take that’s less than verbal plenary inspiration. The result of all of that is that there are no real significances attached to the terms themselves, so they don’t bother to deal in an expository manner. They talk in broad generalities.

But it’s amazing to me also that even evangelicals do the same thing. Recently I, and I’ve done this a couple of times, but when I was giving some messages along this line to a group of pastors, I said “The liberals attack the Bible by denying its truth,” you know, and you can hear the “amens” ripple across the room. And I said, “And then the people who have sort of flipped out on the experiential end and on the Charismatic end and have taken those things to excess, they come along and say…Well, Jesus said to me…or I had a vision…or God spoke to me…or the Lord showed me what this meant.” And what they’re doing really is adding their own experience, their own revelations, their own visions to the Bible and in so doing that they undermine the authority of Scripture, too, and it becomes just as important to for them to teach their experiences as it does to teach the Bible. And so, the purity of expository preaching is watered down. And also what invariably happens is in that particular movement you wind up with a tremendous freedom to use the Bible almost as a creative instrument, it’s almost like a paint brush. You can use it to paint anything you want. You can make verses say whatever you want them to say. You can be very fanciful. You can be very allegorical because your experiences and your feelings and your emotions and your intuitions and your visions and your revelations are substantively the equivalent of Scripture.

And then you have, of course, the evangelical and the fundamental people who would die for the absolute authority of Scripture but they get up week after week in their pulpits and never delineate its principles. And in my judgment, that’s the worst of all because to him that knoweth to do good and doeth it not, to him it is sin. I mean, we know that every word is pure, right? And if we don’t deal in an expository manner with the Word of God, then we’re denying the precept of the Bible itself, that it is in fact in every word the Word of God. And so the greater sin is at the door of the evangelical who affirms this high view of Scripture but number one, doesn’t believe that he should be involved in an expository ministry, or number two, is involved in exposition in a superficial non-diligent way. You can’t treat Scripture like that. If you’re going to do it, you’ve got to get in and be diligent.

We’re surprised the Mighty Hugh Jass Phil Johnson hasn’t covered up this mistake of our inerrant Pope like when he attacked his Truth. Even the late Ken Silva almost turned against the Pope of the Truth War. So remember to preach expositionally instead of topically like Spurgeon preached unless of course you’re the Pope over Truth.

Holding all to the Standard of their Doctrines,

Don Jobson

 

Book Review Of The Month: Doug Wilson’s RapeGod!

May 11, 2019

thugwils

“A man  penetrates, conquers, colonizes, plants. A woman receives, surrenders, accepts.”—Doug Wilson

We’re reviewing book reviews in our local Discernmentalist Book Club this month and this one particular ear-tickling Postmodern unbeliever’s book review of the great Doug Wilson (Neo-Confederate Rape-apologist)‘s wonderfully Biblically accurate book on human relations as defined by God RapeGod made us laugh:

It isn’t fair to critique a book I haven’t read. That being said, the title and the contents offend me right from the start. “RapeGod”: It doesn’t take a genius to observe our current culture and the trashiness that exists–and this “author” will join together in a title what humans have abused with the One who created it (to be enjoyed within the confines of marriage)?

Have some RESPECT for the holy God!! The Jews, out of reverence for God won’t even type or write out his name as we do. They will use G-d!

And the name of the chapters: “God Wears Lipstick”, “Leather, Whips and Fruit”, “Whoopee Forever”. No further comment.

Just read the Bible! See our sin, and how a Holy God cannot have fellowship (connection) with sin, and how he provided redemption Rev. 5:9 “with your blood you purchased men for God”. Read Revelation and how God has a future in Heaven, perfect, free from sin. Rev 4:8: “Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord God Almighty…”.

Whoopee forever? Not. Worship God forever, oh yes!

First Mr. Ear Tickles attacks a core Doctrine of Discernmentalism: reviewing books we haven’t even read and then attacking said books on our Mighty Truth Warrior Blogs—by accusing them of promoting heresy based on a blurb we read online or a video preview. Also the Hard Truths of our Truth War Gospel will always offend those with itching ears looking for a feel-good watered-down sissified Socialist heretically liberal gospel like Emergents preach. Secondly Doug Wilson (Neo-Confederate rape-apologist) only writes on the trashiness of our current culture in order to warn readers of the dangers of our many enemies who attack our Pure Doctrines of Biblical Manhood and womanhood like Emergents; socialists; progressives; Rock music; hippies; Harry Potter; liberals; mystics; video games; the “Emerging” Village People; queerosexuals; femimarxists; girliemen; Ken and Barbie dolls; Pokémon; Santa Claus; the Easter Bunny; aliens; Bigfoot; etc. He only wants to protect women as this quote from the book demonstrates:

If a woman were responsible to submit to men in general, her life would be unbearable no one can serve two masters. But a woman who is responsive to a godly man is protected from having to submit to other men, most of whom are less than godly. She consequently has a great deal more liberty than a woman who not protected in this way. Thus the so-called “independent” woman is not under any kind of protection. She is truly on her own, but with the result being that she is buffeted about by all sorts of men. But if her father were doing what he ought to do, or if she were in a marriage relationship where the husband was doing what he ought to do, she would be protected from the insults and harassment of men in general This explains why some of the most “independent” women are so insecure, and why some of the most submissive women have a real security and strength of mind. Women inescapably need godly masculine protection against ungodly masculine harassment; women who refuse protection from their fathers and husbands must seek it from the police. But women who genuinely insist on “no masculine protection” are really women who tacitly agree on the propriety of rape. Whenever someone sets himself to go against God’s design, horrible problems will always result. The Bible says that we find the way to true self-discovery through self-surrender. Those who exalt themselves are humbled, and vice versa. In the feminist movement over the last several decades, women have been looking for (and have not yet found) themselves. This is because they have been trying to find and identify their role apart from God’s design. The beauty of biblical courtship is that it never leaves women unprotected. (RapeGod pg. 13)

Were Mr. Ear Tickles who we now suspect is a fememergent plant serious about reviewing this classic by Doug Wilson (Neo-Confederate rape-apologist) he would have already known that via Bible-based osmosis. Next his terrible review accuses Doug (Neo-Confederate rape-apologist) of disrespecting the God of the Bible.  How can this be—when Doug (Neo-Confederate rape-apologist) has spent his whole life defending Absolute Biblical Truth such as the Confederacy’s Divine Right to own slaves and commit Treason on account of States’ Rights.  Doug Wilson (Neo-Confederate rape-apologist) has more respect for the God of the Bible than quasi-Universalist mystic emergence guru Rob Bell and the once sex-obsessed Mark Driscoll combined. Here’s proof— later the book stated:

Male authority is an erotic necessity. In order to make love, a man must be hard and the woman soft. This is not just a physiological detail, but a metaphor for their whole relationship. Feminists, having demanded soft men, have discovered that it is beyond exasperating to be locked in a rape fantasy with some Caspar Milquetoast. Ravish me! she pleads with her eyes. Let’s go down to the aquarium, he says, and look at the endangered species exhibit. If you are going to go for soft, then another woman makes better sense. Lesbianism, it turns out, has an internal logic. (RapeGod pgs.142–143)

Next if one’s not willing to write God’s name out then one never believed in God to begin with (by the way God’s name is God as distinguished from other gods or a god like Allah). Also we caught Mr. Ear Tickle lying as he read the chapter titles—so much for not reading the book like a True Discernmentalist book-reviewer does. Here we agree with the ear-tickler to read the Bible but only if its an ODM-approved Bible such as the AV1611 King James or our Truth War Pope’s Glorious Study Bibles. Speaking of our Truth War that book is required reading for all True Truth Warriors—otherwise how will we know which truths of ours are always being attacked that we are called to ever-defend?

Before his concluding remarks Mr. Ear-Tickler mentions the Trinity without shewing how RapeGod by Doug Wilson (Semi-Arian slavery-apologist) defends the unBiblically unorthodox Orthodox Doctrine of Christ’s subordination to the Father in the Godhead just like a woman is subordinate to her father first and then her husband which is exactly nothing at all like the Arian heresy that Christ is subordinate to the Father in the Godhead. One final thought on RapeGod is Doug (Semi-Arian slavery-apologist)‘s warning from it’s epilogue which is why it is highly recommended by Discernmentalists:

Comes now some academic bloviation to help us all through whatever remaining prejudices we might have had about the molestation of children (HT: Baylyblog & Frank Turk). At issue is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), which is still, even in these postmodern times, filled with hatred and outmoded forms of discriminatory malice. It appears that pedophilia and hebephilia are still listed as disorders, and boy, do we have some work to do! You know, addressing all that hatred.

For those just joining us, the days are coming when the only entry left in the DSM will be the then outlawed practice of intercourse in the missionary position by a heterosexual married couple.

Special Discernmentalist Alert—Spurgeon Exposed: Reported Evidence recorded that he slid into False Teaching…

May 11, 2019

earticklingdoctrines

 

 James Grant wrote: “With the deadly heresies entertained and taught by the Plymouth Brethren, in relation to some of the most momentous of all the doctrines of the Gospel, and to which I have adverted at some length, I feel assured that my readers will not be surprised at any other views, however unscriptural and pernicious they may be, which the Darbyites have embraced and zealously seek to propagate”[20]

Breaking we’re being attacked from the grave by one of our own—Spurgeon (False Convert) who we already revealed as a False Convert wrote a critique* of one of our Truth War Pope’s Holiest of Doctrines.

 Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Pastor of the Metropolitan Tabernacle and contemporary of Darby, published criticism of Darby and Brethrenism.[19] His main criticism was that Darby and the Plymouth Brethren rejected the vicarious purpose of Christ’s obedience as well as imputed righteousness. He viewed these of such importance and so central to the Gospel that it led him to publish this statement about the rest of their belief in the Sword and Trowel.

We thought Spurgeon was more of a measure of Truthiness than that but since we exposed him as a False Convert we can’t say we’re surprised that we now have to add False Teacher to his now growing list of impurities in following our Pure Doctrines properly. Here is a quote from Spurgeon (False Convert/False Teacher)’s attack* on the founding father of our Truth War Pope’s Pure Bible Teaching:

3

*- Phil Johnson’s Hugh Jass raptured this attacking critique from his Hugh Jass Spurgeon (False Convert/False Teacher) site as he didn’t want others to know that “self-respecting Calvinist” Spurgeon (False Convert/False Teacher) had impure doctrines for not following the Ways of the Master himself— the Clear Teachings of our Pope of the Truth War John MacArthur (PBUH) that: “Every Self-Respecting Calvinist Should Be A Premillennial Dispensationalist Rapture Believer” (in other words follow Darby’s teachings).