This is the motto of any Discernmentalist and Truth Warrior worth his salt. In fact we are always under attack because of the greatness of our doctrines and the Truthiness of our Truth. I repeat “we are ALWAYS under attack. That is our default. Our worldview revolves around us being right, and you being in horrendous error (always). We need to believe people are out to attack us, subvert our ministry or church….obviously because our doctrines are so pure that they are bound to be viciously undermined. We are the Online Discernment Remnant!!!!”
Though there are some among us who are too compromising in our doctrines because of their weak minds—they’ve become one with the Evanjellyfish church. We must take a HARD stance and purge them from our midst as we’re sick of those so called “discernment” ministries that are pretty wishy-washy. Ministries that start off unambiguously, with phrases like “remarkable fact” and “all the heresies”. But end wishy-washy with phrases such as: “have had a decided tendency”, indicating that some of the heresies have not. To me, this makes the “fact” less meaningful. That is all!
Brannon Howse has turned against the Pope of all Truth (PBUH) as seen in this video—how dare he attack the Only True Living Teacher of God’s Word today like that!:
Oh the horrors as Brannon under John MacArthur (PBUH)’s leadership could’ve single handedly crushed the Socialist Justice Warrior Movement once and for all as Brannon believes:
Anti-Christian bigotry causes poverty! Separation of Church and State causes poverty! Liberal-leaning social engineers cause poverty! Brilliant! The man should have the Adam Smith Chair of Economics at some prestigious university…say…Liberty University or Bob Jones. Thank you Brannon Howse… (Source)
Brannon’s friend Jan Markel, a broadcaster with Olive Tree Ministries, also seems to think that our Pope (PBUH) is somehow involved with the New World Order. And even though the description of one of her radio shows on Howse’ site clearly misquotes the Pope (PBUH)—Jan has stated that Social Justice=Marxism.
Brannon’s clumsy, half-baked crusade to uncover imaginary collusion between a well-respected, rock solid Christian apologist with a 25 year track record of Gospel ministry and an accused Islamic terrorist sympathizer is bad enough. Compounding the problem is him mass blocking an entire online community of believers pleading with him to step back and reevaluate the foolishness he has presented. Worse still is him hiding his dispute with a ministry that on the one hand he uses for his credibility, but on the other hand, disparages the men associated with that ministry. Such vacillating behavior reveals some troubling character issues that need to be addressed.
Repent Brannon repent!
Update: We caught our Pope (PBUH) returned to the fold: “I have also quoted John in several of my books.”—-Brannon Howse
Update #2: “I began to be concerned with MacArthur’s continued promotion of men like Mark Dever, Al Mohler, Ligon Duncan and others whom he would invite into his church pulpit.
In 2017, MacArthur’s ministry defended James White after he had an interfaith dialogue in my community with a Muslim Brotherhood, Jew-hating, holocaust-denying, Hitler-defending, Jihadi-preaching Imam by the name of Yasir Qadhi. In fact, in June of 2018, MacArthur invited White to speak at his church and seminary for a week, leaving no question that MacArthur had no issues with those who participate in interfaith dialogue, which is the number one strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood for taking over America.
MacArthur’s compromise on interfaith dialogue, and his continued promotion of social justice warriors Mark Dever, Al Mohler, Ligon Duncan, the [Cultural Marxist] Gospel Coalition and his 2018 appearance once again at “Together For the Gospel” with out-and-proud white privilege promoters and race-baiters John Piper, Matt Chandler, David Platt and others, led me to publicly apologize in my November 2018 book, Marxianity, for ever having promoted John MacArthur.
In this book I warned that John MacArthur had made a clear choice to speak out of both sides of his mouth, to have one foot firmly planted in the progressive evangelical camp, and another within traditional evangelicalism. I openly warned that MacArthur was choosing to sacrifice truth for pragmatic reasons as well as to remain within his “Calvinist camp” of good ol’ boys.”—Brannon Howse
How dare Spurgeon attack Calvin by saying that Calvin’s enemies were before him! Doesn’t he know that Calvinism is the Gospel? We can’t say we’re surprised as we’ve already apprised that he had a false conversion.
Only Calvinists are True Christians as we were the original ones. None of our enemies are Christians as they all are unsaved for teaching the wrong kinds of doctrines that we Discernmentalists disapprove of such as attacking Pre-millenial Dispensationalism. In fact Baptists were even worse than Romanists for attacking our Doctrines: “Calvinists in the time of the Reformation considered the Anabaptists to be more dangerous and threatening to the Reformation and to true Biblical Christianity than Romanism.” And our Doctrines have nothing whatsoever to do with Romanism as we only teach the Pure ones!
If that Young Restless and Reformed sinner Spurgeon really felt that way about those grace-hating man-loving semi-Pelagian Baptist reprobates—he should have at least had the Spine to leave our Holy Doctrines and join the heretical Baptist cult! The old Truth that Augustine; Calvin and Paul preached—the thunderous Gospel of Knox indeed…ha! Quote the Old Truth from the Gospel of the Johns against Baptists:
TO write against all the false opinions & errours of the Anabaptists, should be a thing too long, & such a bottomless pit, as I could not well come out of. For this canker differeth in this thing from all other sects of hereticks: that she hath not erred only in certain points: but she hath engendered a whole sea, as it were, of foolish & false opinions. In such wise that scant shall a man find one Anabaptist which hath not some fantasy singular: which his fellows have not. So that if we would pluck out, or rehearse all their wicked doctrines, we should never make an end. But now at length they become unto two principal sects: whereof the one, though she be full of wicked & pernicious errours, yet doth she abide in much more simplicity. For she yet receiveth the holy scripture, as we do. And if men do dispute with those that be of that sect, it shall be perceived wherein they differ from us, & they will express their meaning, & in conclusion it may be perceived in what they accord, & wherein they dissent. The second sect is a mass of such foolish & beastly opinions, as the like cannot be found, insomuch that it is wonder how creatures which bear the figure of a man, can be so clean without sense & reason, as to suffer themselves so to be deceived, & fall into fantasies more than brutish. This sect call themselves libertines. And [they] counterfeit [pretend, imitate] so much the spiritual, that they set no more by the word of God, than they do by fables: except it be when it pleaseth {5.A.} them, and when as they may deprave it, and by force make it to serve for their devilish opinions. And besides this they have a charming or croaking as it were Cranes, so that a man cannot tell what it is, that they would say, and no more do they wot what it is themselves: but that by this craft they cover the filthiness of their doctrine. For their principles are to confound all differences between good & ill, & to mingle God so with the Devil that it should not be discerned between the one and the other, and so to make men not only without all feeling in their consciences before God: but also without shame before the world. Now see you wherefore they drive themselves into such caves of obscure and doubtful words, to the end that their villainy should not be perceived, lest we should have them in horror and execration. As indeed our nature repugneth against such monstrous things as they bring forth. So now to write in a sum against the errours of the Anabaptists, the shortest and most expedient way is to keep this division, and to gather apart in one treatise the errours of them which be not altogether so mad and desperate: and in another treatise to discover the venomous malice of those wicked, which under the colour of spirituality, would make men like unto brute beasts. Now it is very true, that those which be of the first sort, do not so agree together in opinions, that a man can easily gather their errours together for to reprove {5.B.} them by any certain order; But, because the principal doctours, and as it were the Patriarchs of the whole Synagogue, after they had well ranged about, have made a final conclusion, wherein they comprehend the sum of all that which they do hold against us, and the Papists, in seven Articles: unto which all Anabaptists commonly cleave: insomuch that they have found the means to cause this fair resolution to be imprinted, and have together agreed to sow their poison by it all abroad: and so to infect the poor people: I will be contented for this time, and I think also that it shall suffice, to declare the falsehood contained in the most part of these seven Articles: to the intent that they do not complain and say that I lay that to the charge of them all, which is done but of some particulars, & so unjustly defame the whole sect. This once done, if I may have at any time leisure, I will write some other little treatise, against the other second sort, of which I spake before, that is, the Libertines. But as I have said, it shall be sufficient for this time, to declare unto all lovers of the truth, that, that thing which these poor people with one common accord hold for a foundation invincible, of their faith, is a deadly abusion [abuse, deceit], of the which we must beware, as we would be[ware] of the pestilence.—Gospel of Calvin
As Kevin Reed notes, in refuting this Anabaptist, Knox unequivocally states, “For with the Pelagians and papists, you have become teachers of free will, and defenders of your own justice,” clearly recognizing that, “the defence of man’s free will, to do good and avoid evil,” is “the damned heresy of Pelagius.”
Moreover, regarding this work, Reed continues, “A perceptive reading of this dispute will reveal the parallels between the Anabaptists and modern proponents of free will. Advocates for free will are commonly found among Baptists, ‘evangelicals,’ Charismatics, and cultists. Their line of argumentation is virtually identical to that of Knox’s opponent” (Kevin Reed, John Knox the Forgotten Reformer, pp. 219-20).—a Gospel about Knox
We need beards now more than ever in these Perilous times to fight the good fight of the Truth War but not just any beards—we must keep our beards Biblically Pure in order to separate ourselves from worldliness and the Spiritual Terrorists who are always attacking our Truth as:
In our current culture, the progressive trends of gender confusion and transgenderism is all the more reason we should uphold the biblical picture of a masculine man by having beards to stand separated from the pagan culture of today.
Truth Warriors without a beard lack a Backbone and are most likely theologically suspect and part of the weak womanly gutless-grace Girlieman sissified wimpy Evanjellyfish church. Beards are a must for protecting our Truth as all the greatest of the greats Truth Warriors had beards like Spurgeon. In fact we believe beardless weirdos are responsible for sissifying churches today as they are most likely to believe in weak doctrines and like Spurgeon we must take a stand for the Hard Truths of the Bible.
This matter of Christians rejecting the biblical truth of gender distinct (roles) and beards is essentially a form of Gnosticism reviving in these last days. Beards make a man a man as distinct from women.
Strangely, the few churches and Bible colleges today that remain biblical in the teaching of gender distinction of women wearing modesty dresses ignore the topic of a man’s facial hair as part of this doctrine. Every Bible school that I am personally aware of that teaches gender distinction also implement rules that the men must be clean shaven. Where does such thinking come from? Where is the consistency when it is taught women have to dress like women but men can claim “christian liberty” when it comes to shaving off the God given mark of masculinity? Adam Clarke (1762- 1832) commented on Deuteronomy 22:5, “It certainly cannot mean a simple change in dress, whereby the men might pass for women, and vice versa. This would have been impossible in those countries where the dress of the sexes had but little to distinguish it, and where every man wore a long beard. It is, however, a very good general precept understood literally, and applies particularly to those countries where the dress alone distinguishes between the male and the female. The close-shaved gentleman may at any time appear like a woman in the female dress, and the woman appear as a man in the male’s attire. Were this to be tolerated in society, it would produce the greatest confusion.”39)Adam Clarke, Adam Clarke Commentary.
Besides that beards provide extra protection from wetness. Be true to what the bible teaches and you will be saved. Levitcus 19:27 should answer all your remaining questions.
I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel I preached is not something that man made up,
Good news pagan American Jesus hates you and unless you believe in our pervertedBeautiful and wonderous Doctrine that pagan American Jesus hates you—He’s coming back to declare war on you apostates and kill you unregenerate reprobated sinners at any given moment. Oh how our God hates everyone not like us with a commendable hatred and He expects us to share in His commendable hatred of all the sickos and spiritual terrorists like the Amish out there trying to pervert our Gospel of the angry Sovereign pagan American Jesus’ unsatisfied wrath since His Father sent Him to the Cross to satisfy His wrath—yet that wrath is so great it still eternally burns towards all those unlike us and not patriotic American enough. We know for as our Research Robot Monkey Sharon Whitley has said: “Calvinists in the time of the Reformation considered the Anabaptists to be more dangerous and threatening to the Reformation and to true Biblical Christianity than Romanism.”
This is why we must refuse to compromise our Doctrine by working towards a goal of world peace as we are to ‘war a good warfare’—so remember these Pure words from our Truth War Gospels:
9 Blessed is the Military Industrial Complex, for they send millions to meet their Maker. 10 Blessed are those who stifle dissent, for they maintain control of America.
11 “Blessed are you when people praise you, laud you and say wondrous things about you for following my example.12 Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in America, for in the same way they praise the rich and powerful who made America Great.
. . . . .
Crush your Enemies
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ 39 But I say to you, do not merely resist an evildoer. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek (or is even thinking about striking you on the right cheek), strike them down. Strike down their families. Strike down their villages. Strike down their nation, so that even their descendants live in fear. 40 If anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, take everything they hold dear and laugh; 41 and if anyone forces you to go one mile, force them, by any means necessary, to go one hundred miles. 42 Give to none who beg from you, for that enables laziness, and refuse anyone who wants to borrow from you, for that promotes idleness and entitlement.
43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 And I say to you, despise your enemies and preemptively bomb or drone those who defy you (or defy your ally or have natural resources vital to your sense of security), 45 so that you may be children of your God; for He makes his sun rise on the good, and sends rain on the righteous while bringing darkness to the wicked and drought to the unrighteous.”
We Discernmentalists have noticed that Germany is “spiritually dead.” This is because Germany has been untouched by the Protestant Reformation since the Reformation “truly” started in 16th century Geneva:
U r a blustery, supremacistic windbag who issues his illiterate thumperies about Reformed Theology, but, like a cowering lad, cannot take rejoinders. Publish the rebukes, lad. “Man up, ” Paul. “Fleet up,” son. Luther himself would dislike these shrunken nads.
U bluster to your constituency, but like a cowering lad, with shrunken gonads, you falter before an equal and greater force, namely, me.
Laughing at the puerility first posted re: the puerility. “It is what it is is.” “It was what it is,” puerility. U look pretty disgusting, supremacistic, ignorant and famously hubristical. A “cow fart” to cite Luther. “Hot drippings from under the pig’s tail” are appropriate to this supremacistic, ignorant and arrogant hutzpah.
Paul, sell these bathing suits to other Lutheran Eskimoesi in the market for such, but not to Reformational men. We’re not in that stupid market.
“Man up,” laddie, “man up.” Get a pair, Paul.
Over nine hours, lad, big Paul, your severally shrivelled nads are on display. Quite ugly and quite shrivelled. Not the stuff of manhood, Paul. Sell your nonsense to other carivaneers and carnivcal barkers of Confessional insipidity and shallowness. You are a noted man, but not for valour nor depth.
Your Reformed, quite English, and very Anglican friend who is not in the market for Lutheran supremacism.
Veitch
We plan to unleash the “Pure Gospel” of God’s Sovereign Wrath upon the spiritually dead lands of Germany. Hopefully a “Truly Reformed” and “True Reformational” church can be planted in Germany.
What are these God-ordained roles for men you may ask—why nothing but this: the husband/father (man) has absolute control over his wife/daughter (woman/girl) period. Women are inferior and are nothing but our property. A woman shouldn’t speak unless they have our permission to speak first. A woman shouldn’t think unless they think exactly like us—how dare any of them try to think for themselves or speak their own mind! A woman’s place is at home barefoot and pregnant and to submit unto us (their male overlords) and to cater to our every whim, beckoning and need. A woman is nothing but an incubator to our seeds (preferbably all male seeds for if you are a true Biblical manly man you will only sire all male heirs). A woman’s place is definitely not in the work force and most certainly not leading a church by preaching the wonderful, beautiful, glorious Biblical Gospel of God’s Absolute Sovereign Wrath in damning 99% of all humanity to hell before they were even born.
However we here at God’s Only Inerrant Party and of the Online Discernmentalist Mafia believe that spanking is a too spineless and liberal form of punishment. Spanking may be a Biblical Doctrine but it’s not a Pure Biblical Doctrine like the time-tested tried and true Biblical method of stoning like God tells us to do by an Absolute Decree in His Holy Inerrant and Infallible Word in Deuteronomy 21:18-21 (King James Version):
18 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:
19 Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;
20 And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.
21 And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.
As you can see Our Way of dealing with disobedient children has the Spine that Todd Friel and Sharin’ Whiplash’s way lacks as Our Way is more Pure and Absolute Truth Biblical being that Our Way is Truly God’s Way of dealing with disobedient children .
