Archive for the ‘R. C. Sproul’ Category

Flaming Calvinists?

January 9, 2011

So I had some of our Research Robot Monkeys do some researchmentalism on a supposedly Christian Forum for a  new Discernmentalist article against the many heresies of the Emergent Church when they came across a character who had the title of “Flaming Calvinist:”

Notice there are many errors here concerning this arunma fellow:

  1. How can there be any “flaming Calvinists” that is a contradiction of terms. One can’t be simultaneously saved and a homosexual at the same time—Brian McLaren and the Emergent Church teaches that it’s ok to be gay and that gay Christians are saved. The Bible however is Absolutely Clear that all homosexuality (sodomy) is an unbiblical abomination and an unforgivable sin as clearly taught by Jesus and the Apostles in the Bible. To paraphrase my colleague Dr. I. Todyaso: One thing we do not need is Gay Calvinists out there perverting the Doctrines of Grace. How dare this so called character suggest he can be gay and a Bible-Believing Calvinist at the same time that’s about as oxymoronic as saying one is a Christian and an  Arminian at the same time! (Just ask Sharon about that!) The next thing you know Calvinists will be ordaining homosexuals….blasphemy!
  2. The only flaming that Bible-Believing Christians need is to roast heretics alive over a stake whether it be in reality or cyber-reality as John Knox’s clear teachings teach us
  3. How can anyone hold to the Biblical Doctrines of Grace and yet pledge allegiance to the Democratic Party? The two are antithetical as Democrats are anti-Christian. One can never vote Democrat as a True Bible-Believing Calvinist as Democrats reject the Bible and accept:  welfare queens,  Islamofascism, atheism, homosexuality, abortion and the rest of the sins that we take a stand against.

Discernmentalist Ecumenism

April 25, 2010

   

We must stand against those who oppose our Pure Doctrines. Certainly even being seen with those who think differently than Us sends a message to the world—a message that says We approve of their false beliefs even if their politics are Orthodox. We must not even look in the same general direction as those who disagree with Us or else people may mistake Us for our enemies. If someone says anything moderately approving of Michelangelo‘s statue of David or the Sistine Chapel, they are clearly suspect of being a closet Pope-worshipping Romanist.

If anyone invites a Muslim over for dinner, they secretly approve of Islamic terrorism. If you like any Elton John song, you condone the unnatural and deviant behavior and immorality of homosexuality. We may approve of someone’s Orthodox Politics aka Republican leaning politics but unless they believe in our Pure Religious Doctrines they’re Pure Political Doctrines are meaningless. We may stand against abortion but if We stand against abortion in the presence of a Roman Catholic, they may think that We approve of  their Dark, Satanic, Degenerate, Reprobate, False and Cultic Religious Belief System even if We agree with their anti-abortion stance as We most certainly can’t approve of anything Roman Catholic, worldly or apostate.

We Discernmentalists are not ecumenists while at the same time We are ecumenical, however, We must be ecumenical in our divisionism and divisional in our ecumenism. Using our Discernmentalist logic which We apply to everything We’ll illustrate this point: When anti-Pedobaptism Credobaptist Al Mohler joins together with the staunch Pedobaptist defender of Pedobaptism  R. C. Sproul in partnership to unite against the Emergent heresy—this is an example of Good Discernmentalist Ecumenism aka being ecumenical without being a ecumenist. Another example is when “Ingrid Schuelter (who may also have Lutheran leanings as she partakes in Advent against Ken Silva’s clear teachings of its Pagan origins)” and Ken Silva agree on anything in order to defend our Pure Doctrines against apostates. Get it, got it…good, because We told you so.