Archive for the ‘Absolute Truth War’ Category

Racial Profiling…Amen!

October 12, 2019

2015-03-30-1427684551-2306082-Discriminationsigns

So racial and religious minorities get profiled? Boo freaking hoo—big deal—=who cares? I’ve never been profiled and I’ve been pat down at airports—no big deal so its not racist. Why do all these minority buttercups have to whine all the time since racism is non-existent? If these minorities don’t like being profiled they’re always free to leave our glorious Country.

Let me tell you about the true racism: Democraps they’re the party of the KKK and they’re racist against us white Conservative American Christian males and are for abortion. In fact they racially target and profile our blogs and say mean things about us. For they hate us for preaching the Truth that: “ – A leftist cannot possibly get into the Heaven as they’ll be automatically disqualified for promoting abortion, gay marriage, White genocide, etc.”

Why are these minorities so selfish and make themselves victims for the points on the demoncrat scorecard? Don’t they know we’re the True Victims? Why can’t they think of others for a change like us white Conservative American Christian males (the #1 discriminated against group in the entire world)?

“I’m not usually emotionally upset by the racism I encounter — I’ve experienced it my whole life and have learned how to deal with it,” says Singh.

Funny, after reading this I would have said the exact opposite. Singh appears–and there are plenty of other articles to substantiate this–to be absolutely obsessed and hellbent with finding racism everywhere he goes.

I grew up in a fairly WASPy environment, and while I check my privilege (and am more than happy to bestow some of it to Mr. Singh, though, with a lucrative appointment at a prestigious university, I’m not sure he needs it), I also have unusually thick dark eyebrows, and though I don’t dress “ethnic” by my definition, my clothes are colorful and quirky because that’s what I like. I’ve been pulled over for special screening at least 4 times, including the swabbing of the hands. And virtually every time I check my luggage I learn later that it went through a special investigation.

Oh well! I also don’t devote the time to a self-pitying screed on a nationally recognized publication, but then, I’m not that important and haven’t been asked to write such a thing. I guess that’s another aspect of my privilege I checked…but perhaps shouldn’t have?

I know many Southeast Asians who find they get pulled over more than others–they shrug it aside or even turn it into a snide joke. A much better coping tool. And men in general get profiled by crime at 10X the rate of women; should all men rally about the injustice of “gender profiling”? Well, they do tend to commit more violent crimes… The saddest part is Singh is undoubtedly inculcating this same degree of race-obsession in his little girl, so, as an adult, she can be miserable and presume mal-intent when there is none. So, if I feel not a shred of pity (after all, why bother when Mr. Singh devotes so much pity to himself), does that make me a racist bigot? Oh well again!

Besides that racial profiling keeps America safe…Duh!:

” I can only imagine what she was thinking, trying to figure out what her father had done wrong to deserve such treatment.” You could have taught your 3 year old daughter and wife that isn’t it great how our country is so concerned for our welfare and safety that unfortunately choosing you again, may have been abrupt – at least they cared enough to protect you and others in the country.”I was racially profiled at airport security and overheard the young kid behind me ask his mom why I was standing in line and what I did wrong.” Again, if you don’t like how other Americans keep their country safe, go live in another one.”I gazed through my daughter’s eyes and got my first glimpse into how she would internalize racism.” You could have gazed into her eyes and asked her if it isn’t commendable how “we” keep America safe? No, you chose to be a victim

“My own government is teaching my daughter to think less of me” You taught her that all on your own buttercup. You could have taken the opportunity to not feel sorry for yourself and uphold the people, in some cases, who are dying to protect your freedom to whine.

Our Conditions for God’s Unconditional Grace…

October 11, 2019

images

God’s Grace is unconditional as the U and I in TULIP points out and we always scream and yell about and preach from our pulpits and debate/argue with grace-hating man-loving semi-Pelagian Armenians over—however just because God’s Grace is unconditional doesn’t mean His love is:

 

“the love of God that is unconditional,” The love of God is not unconditional. “Acts 17:30 English Standard Version (ESV) 30 The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent” There is the condition. Anyone teaching otherwise is lying.” It’s supposed to be a love that is real and genuine, that can accept people for who they are, even if you don’t agree with them.” Baloney. Loving someone is bringing them to the knowledge of Christ, not accepting their sin,.

“18 And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in[b] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you Matthew 28 – no unconditional love there either.

In fact we know there are terms and conditions to God’s Unconditional Grace (love) as we wrote them so if anyone violates any of our terms & conditions we can only conclude that God has deemed them unworthy of His Unconditional Grace (love). Terms and conditions that make you unworthy of God’s Unconditional Grace (love):

  1. You’re Armenian.
  2. You’re gay or have spoken nicely of gays.
  3. You had or are thinking about having an abortion.
  4. You believe feminism.
  5. You’re a Democrat or even voted Democrat even once.
  6. You’re an anti-Trump RINO.
  7. You don’t believe in Hell.
  8. You believe God is full of love not Holy Sovereign Wrath.

However once again we must give a free pass to our fellow warmongers even-though they violate all that Jesus commanded in the Sermon on the Mount and our Most Biblical and Godly President ever even-though he violated all that Jesus commanded on divorce and remarriage. All those who put America First are exempt from the terms and conditions we’ve placed on God’s Unconditional Grace (love).

 

Warmongering Exempt

September 23, 2019

lau4qfz3tz821

1 Thessalonians 5:22 King James Version (KJV) 22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.

We are to shun the appearance of evil Rock. If one is not aware of the circumstances, one is not obliged, and I doubt Christ would hold it against him/her. It is when one knows that makes the difference. I do know that is was that verse is about. In reference to the cake, it would be evil to participate in the “celebration” and one should not appear as they are. “Abstain from every form of evil. 23 Now may the God of peace himself sanctify you completely, and may your whole spirit and soul and body be kept blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.” The vendor doesn’t disapprove – what they want violates Christ’s will.

We agree as appearing evil is to be evil. However once again we must give our Holy Military an exemption. We must celebrate their contract killings every few months or else our enemies will prevent us from worshipping our God the Prince of Peace and take away our Holy Wars and then Trump won’t be able to Make America Great Again—since the Communist Liberal Democrat Party will close down all our churches like they did in that great documentary about the War on Christmas:

This movie is about freedom! It is right on target as it deals with today’s world, a world which tells Christians to remove Nativity scenes and religious symbols and to never say, “Merry Christmas” but only to say, “Happy Holidays.” This film just might inspire you to remember that our forefathers came to this land to have freedom of religion, not freedom “from” religion.

A young man named Tom dies in the war and his father, Bob, himself a war hero, loses heart and stops fighting for what he once believed. Tom’s widow and infant son move away. Years later when they return for a visit, with Bob’s grandson Christian now fourteen years old, Christian reminds Bob of the need to stand for what he believes. Bob is now mayor of Mt. Columbus, and he wants it to become known as “Christmas City.” Bob has plenty of opposition from various political figures but he is determined to make sure that his son did not die in vain, but that he will enjoy the religious freedoms he had a part in fighting for.

And what better way to celebrate our freedom and our homeless Prince of Peace than to celebrate our military. Besides that bombing poor people’s countries 24/7 creates so much life and saves so many souls!

Militarism gets a Free Pass

September 21, 2019

mi

What did Christ teach on homosexuality?
Leviticus 18:22 – 22 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 – If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.
Problem solved

What did Christ teach on murder?

Leviticus 24:17-22 New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)17 Anyone who kills a human being shall be put to death. 18 Anyone who kills an animal shall make restitution for it, life for life. 19 Anyone who maims another shall suffer the same injury in return: 20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; the injury inflicted is the injury to be suffered. 21 One who kills an animal shall make restitution for it; but one who kills a human being shall be put to death. 22 You shall have one law for the alien and for the citizen: for I am the Lord your God.

Problem solved—however being the good Bible-Believing Americans that we are—we must give our boys in the military a free pass as they are good guys and all our enemies are hell-bound reprobates. As my co-Truth Warrior Dr. Truthslayer has pointed out already:

I must strongly caution you (STOP!!!) looking critically with the respect of the two wars in Iraq in both 1991 and 2003…remember they are clearly the bad guys. True bible believing-naturalized-christian-republicans never question war. To question war is to be liberal. Its ok to protest the killing of the unborn, just don’t protest against young adults going off to fight for their tribe country by getting their brains blown out. That’s different. We need to fight for whatever lie our government tells us to fight for. Remember Jesus calls us sheep for a reason.

Remember also  Jesus Himself said to war a good warfare in I Timothy which He wrote Himself of course. Pay no attention to those loony liberal verses that supposedly were quotes of Jesus about turning the other cheek or putting away one’s weapons and studying war no more as that never works. I hope that clears up who is exempt from  literally following  the laws of Leviticus—besides that Leviticus 24 is clearly only a ceremonial law and can’t possibly apply to the military of God’s Holy Chosen Nation—America—only Leviticus 18/20 are moral laws to be applied eternally for all times.

Social Justice is Incompatible with Our Gospel!

September 18, 2019

Any-Rand-vs-Jesus

“I give people Ayn Rand with trappings,” Anton LaVey founder of the Church Of Satan once told the Washington Post . On another occasion he acknowledged that his brand of Satanism was “just Ayn Rand’s philosophy with ceremony and ritual added.”

Social Justice is an abomination and incompatible with our True Gospel for as we all know our Pope John MacArthur (PBUH) has decreed:

Anyone who claims victim status can easily and effectually harness the emotional appeal of a plea for “social justice” both to gain support and to silence opposition.Indeed, as social justice rhetoric has gained currency among evangelicals, just about every cause that is deemed politically correct in the secular world is steadily gaining momentum among evangelicals. It would be folly to pretend the social justice movement poses no threat whatsoever to evangelical conviction.

Evangelicals seldom explicitly define what they mean by “social justice”—possibly because if they gave an accurate definition of where that term came from and what it means in the secular academy, they might lose a lot of evangelical support. Countless critics have pointed out that the rhetoric of “social justice” is deeply rooted in Gramscian Marxism. For many decades, “social justice” has been employed as political shorthand by radical leftists as a way of calling for equal distribution of wealth, advantages, privileges, and benefits—up to and including pure Marxist socialism.

And  we wouldn’t want to appear Marxist like Martin Luther the father of our Protestant Gospel:  “ . . . In a well-arranged commonwealth the debts of the poor who are in need ought to be cancelled, and they ought to be helped; hence the action of collecting has its place only against the lazy and the ne’er-do-well” (“Lectures on Deuteronomy”). “ . . . How skillfully Sir Greed can dress up to look like a pious man if that seems to be what the occasion requires, while he is actually a double scoundrel and a liar” (“Commentary on the Sermon on the Mount”). “God opposes usury and greed, yet no one realizes this because it is not simple murder and robbery. Rather usury is a more diverse, insatiable murder and robbery. . . . Thus everyone should see to his worldly and spiritual office as commanded to punish the wicked and protect the pious” (An die Pfarrherrn). Or even John Calvin father of our Beloved Pope’s theology. No we’d much rather wed Ayn Rand into our bibles.
 Finally we leave you these remarks from one of our Research Robot Monkeys:
Sandi in EL a day ago

While some may think the SJ gospel is important, salvation is more important. Also, Christ does not bless whomever we choose to love.

“The ad goes on to refer to Scripture several times while outlining a decidedly liberal visio n for Georgia that showcases implicit support for immigrants, the environment, abortion rights, people of color, and same-sex marriage.” Yes, after our Christian family, we should support immigrants, but Christians do not support abortion rights, or same sex marriage (Unless of the Curryite persuasion)

” but if you’re going to bring your faith to the forefront, I think we need to remember who Christ was,” How is one supporting their faith in Christ when supporting things He called an abomination? She serves a different christ – an idol.

““This was a brown-skinned Jewish refugee and a wrongly convicted death-row inmate who told people to give away their possessions and help the poor and ministered specifically to the marginalized … bringing people together, not ripping them apart.” lol…..who is your brown skinned refugee honey? Christ told the rich young ruler to get rid of his belongings because he loved them more than Him. Marginalized? I’d be interested in scripture. Bringing people together….” “I came to cast fire on the earth, and would that it were already kindled! 50 I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how great is my distress until it is accomplished! 51 Do you think that I have come to give peace on earth? No, I tell you, but rather division. 52 For from now on in one house there will be five divided, three against two and two against three. 53 They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.” Luke 12:49

“Her excitement was evident when she was asked to list her favorite Bible verses, pointing to the call to help the “least of these” in the Gospel of Matthew’s 25th chapter” If you want to help the “least of these” why are you not helping the homosexuals to an eternity with this Christ that you think you know?

I hope the voters know scripture better than she does (Our American Gospel)

Shocked: Doug Wilson secretly supports abortion….

September 9, 2019

the-abortion-rate-is-at-an-all-time-low-and-better-12379848b

Abortion doesn’t kill babies people do. The only way to stop bad abortions is good abortion policy.”

Having acknowledged that murder arises from the sinful heart of man, and not from the availability of abortion, we should nevertheless acknowledge that in this sinful world, murder rates can vary, and that there can be genuine secondary causes that can affect this. Intelligent public policy should therefore be interested in pursuing any avenue that promises to help us address this. But we are not having an intelligent public policy debate on this subject because certain proposed answers are outlawed a priori—meaning that you will not be able to get them on the agenda. Positively, we find that widespread abortion discourages baby killing. Laws permitting birth control discourage abortion. Negatively, why are we not allowed to ask why these pro-gun anti-abortion activists are overwhelmingly young men who grew up learning misogyny from peers? Perhaps it is the case that a strong female presence in the home who had an abortion is rather the thing that prevents toxic masculinity and a child growing up  with an  abusive parent? And why are we not permitted to ask what prescription drugs pro-gun anti-abortion activists are on? Why is that a closed subject? Why is no one that interested in how many of these pro-gun anti-abortion activists are pot smokers? How many of them have beards and tattoos or ear-piercings? How many are addicted to rap and violent videogames?

Reformed Shooters?

September 8, 2019

d9dc84bc-ec0b-4713-a45b-e9b7e449029f

More moron Doug Wilson and guns: Having acknowledged that murder arises from the sinful heart of man, and not from the availability of guns, we should nevertheless acknowledge that in this sinful world, murder rates can vary, and that there can be genuine secondary causes that can affect this. Intelligent public policy should therefore be interested in pursuing any avenue that promises to help us address this. But we are not having an intelligent public policy debate on this subject because certain proposed answers are outlawed a priori—meaning that you will not be able to get them on the agenda. Positively, we find that widespread gun ownership discourages gun violence. Laws permitting concealed carry discourage gun violence. Negatively, why are we not allowed to ask what if these mass shooters belong to Reformed churches? Perhaps it is the case that preaching a God who sovereignly selected a few and elevated them to special spiritual elitist caste status is rather the thing that causes toxic masculinity? And why are we not permitted to ask if the shooters had overdue library books? Why is that a closed subject? Why is no one that interested in how many of these shooters were straight C students? How many of them owned Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology? How many of them agree with Doug that:

Slavery as it existed in the South was not an adversarial relationship with pervasive racial animosity. Because of its dominantly patriarchal character, it was a relationship based on mutual affection and confidence. There has never been a multi-racial society which has existed with such mutual intimacy and harmony in the history of the world. … Slave life was to [the slaves] a life of plenty, of simple pleasures, of food, clothes, and good medical care.” (Southern Slavery As It Was, pages 23 to 25)

Or: When we quarrel with the way the world is, we find that the world has ways of getting back at us. In other words, however we try, the sexual act cannot be made into an egalitarian pleasuring party. A man penetrates, conquers, colonizes, plants. A woman receives, surrenders, accepts.

“Women inescapably need godly masculine protection against ungodly masculine harassment; women who refuse protection from their fathers and husbands must seek it from the police. But women who genuinely insist on ‘no masculine protection’ are really women who tacitly agree on the propriety of rape.” (Douglas Wilson, Her Hand in Marriage, p. 13)

Self-Defense is Armenianism!

September 7, 2019

arm

“Obama; Reagan and anyone for gun control are some of my all-time heroes of the faith. What great men, and greatly used of God. Thank You, Lord, for Your servants, Obama; Reagan; gun control advocates, without whom we would be still struggling in the darkness of Roman Armenianism, that man-exalting heresy!”—Sherman M. Whitley

Self-defense is nothing more than self-worship and self-worship is Armenianist heresy—the road to Rome. Quote:

What does Arminianism teach? Is the “god” of Arminianism the God of the Bible? No. Arminius did not plagiarize the bible; instead, he fabricated a brand new deity, or idol, for men to worship. The “god” of Arminianism is not the God of the Bible. For Arminius’ “god” loves everyone equally, and sent his “Son” to die for all men equally. This “god” did not decree the salvation of anyone in particular, and “the christ” of Arminianism did not die for anyone in particular. Instead Arminius’ “god” decreed and his “christ” died for making a “way” of salvation. The Bible, in refuting this, teaches quite a different God. God has predestined only the elect to salvation. These are those for who He “so loved” and “gave” in His beloved Son Jesus Christ (John 3:16). The Bible depicts Christ as the one who fulfills the works of the Covenant of Redemption and bestows, unilaterally, this effectual work in the Covenant of Grace through the power of the Holy Sprit only to those for whom He died. This is the basic Old Testament concept of sacrifice and atonement. Sacrifice and atonement are given on behalf of a particular person, or for the nation of Israel. It did not extend beyond those bounds. Jesus Christ died for His people, the elect. These are those that the Father has elected before the foundation of the world, and those He has predestined to everlasting life.

Who are thee o wicked men to talketh back to thy Sovereign Creator to thinketh that thine wicked worthless wretched sinful life is worthy of defense? Canst the clay talketh back to the potter? If your life is worthy of defense then God will defend it out of His Sovereign Will not yours. Repent and deny thyselves Man-exalters…heretics.

This Just In: U2’s Bono Pulls Emergents To Hell

July 17, 2019

mac001

Bono (Pictured)

Breaking News from the Frontlines of the Truth WarThis article will show you that not only are Bono and C. S. Lewis by guilt of association not a Christian, but that they are both really from the dark side:

Have you been fooled by this rocker, who talks about his love for Jesus, but in reality shows his love for Satan during his performances? He has an alter ego named “MacPhisto.” Did you know that MacPhisto is in The Screw Tape Letters, by C.S. Lewis. The book’s characters are demons, and MacPhisto is a demon who works hard at communicating with baby Christians to get them away from God!

“But U2 is much more than a popular rock band. U2 has a great influence in the emerging church and the contemporary worship movement. U2’s lead singer Bono is praised almost universally among contemporary and emerging Christians. Phil Johnson observes that “Bono seems to be the chief theologian of the Emerging Church Movement” (Absolutely Not! Exposing the Post-modern Errors of the Emerging Church, pg. 9).

Oh the sheer horror! The sinfully horrifyingly devilish pic above is enough to lead me away from Biblical Christianity but I’m even more horrified that the article quoted above mentioned C. S. Lewis (a known heretic). Don’t they know that C. S. Lewis is a heretic as per our Clear Teachings? In fact he’s even beloved by Emerging heretics so that makes him equally heretical in keeping with our traditions by our laws of guilt by association. Here are some of the things these Emergent heretics have said about C. S. Lewis (a heretic):

  • “Like you, I have great respect for C. S. Lewis…”—Brian McLaren
  • “I am busy because I am lazy. I indolently let others decide what I will do instead of resolutely deciding myself. It was a favorite theme of C. S. Lewis that only lazy people work hard. By lazily abdicating the essential work of deciding and directing, establishing values and setting goals, other people do it for us.” ― Eugene Peterson
  • “Following Christ includes belonging, not just believing. British author and theologian C.S. Lewis noted that the word membership is of Christian origin, but the world has emptied it of its original meaning.”—Rick Warren
  • Urban Faith notes on Rob Bell:  Bell’s view on hell is like that of C.S. Lewis (not a surprise: he directs readers to Lewis’ Great Divorce in the back of the book): people get what they want.

From all of this we can gather that C.S. Lewis (a heretic) would’ve been a U2 fan were he still around in today’s perilous times—even Bono himself has a fondness for heretic C. S. Lewis:

“Many readers of this blog will be aware of Bono’s affection for C. S. Lewis, and how Lewis has influenced his theological commitments. You hear the echo of Lewis’s trilemma here from the book, Bono in Conversation, distinguishing “karma” from “grace,” which, Bono declares, is a “mind blowing concept…that keeps me on my knees.”

On reading said quote of Bono on Jesus Emerging heretic Frank Viola exclaimed: Is the Lead Singer of U2 the New C.S. Lewis? Other Discernmentalist Ministries have also observed Lewis’ heresies: “CS Lewis – his style dupes many Christians…his style is a Trojan horse for bad theology.” ~ Mike Abendroth. Dr. Hugh Jass himself—Phil Johnson’s mighty Pyromaniacs has stated:

CS Lewis did not believe in Hell and he believed in purgatory. CS Lewis was heavily influenced by his friend JRR Tolkien (who wrote Lord of the Rings) a Roman Catholic and he was also influenced by the writings of GK Chesterton, another Romanist.

Tolkien was disappointed that CS Lewis moved from his atheism but not to the Roman Catholic Church. Lewis was sort of “Anglo-Catholic.” Anyway, Tolkien’s influence on Lewis may explain Lewis’ heterodoxy.

Most importantly the Ways of the Master himself—the Pope of the Truth War John MacArthur (PBUH) declares:

Not many evangelicals would openly claim to believe in purgatory, even if their eschatology bears a striking resemblance to Catholic dogma. Eschewing the Catholic emphasis on works righteousness, a growing number in the church believe that God’s grace extends to sinners beyond the grave, rescuing them from the due penalty of their sin in the afterlife. C.S. Lewis’s book The Great Divorceplays out this theory in narrative form, as unrepentant sinners are coaxed into heaven by the saints.

But that view has no biblical basis—it’s driven by sentiment, not Scripture.

Therefore we can only conclude that NOW THE END BEGINS are leading millions away from Biblical Christianity by mentioning C. S. Lewis (a heretic).

 

 

Gays join the Truth War against Feminists

June 10, 2019

 

-1421216048411761752

“I’m a gay man. I am not a feminist. There’s a shocking statement. How could any gay man not need, want, support, affirm feminism?

What I learned surprised me. I learned that feminism was not about equality. I learned about the feminist history of hatred toward gay men. And eventually, I learned that feminism was actively engaged in a campaign that was doing to all men what others have so often done to gay men: demonize them as sexual predators and abusers in the interests of their own power and their own ideology.

Feminism wasn’t about equality: It was about bigotry.”—Matthew Lye

We couldn’t hardly believe it when our Research Robot Monkeys stumbled upon this shocking statement. We’re so shocked we’re pressed for words. How can this be? Everyone knows that gays are liberals and that feminists are liberals too—and that all liberals love gays and feminists equally. Its part of their pledge to use the Trojan Horse of gay feminism to destroy the American church by legalizing the gay feminist agenda to turn men into effeminate weak gutlesss grace girlie-men. In fact when I showed this Researchmentalism for the very article I’m writing to my co-laborer in Discernmentalism—-Dr. I. Todyaso—he exclaimed: “I hate this but most importantly I hate myself for not knowing who to hate more—but then I thought to myself what would John MacArthur (PBUH) do? Why! Point out his finger of self-righteous judgment at both groups and hate them both equally.” On the one hand—we’d like to thank the gays for helping us hate the feminists more—on the other—we’d like to thank the feminists for helping us to hate the gays more. Even-so you’re not fooling any of us as you’re not really among us Truth Warriors.

Update: Rumor has it that Dr. I. Todyaso has gone into hiding somewhere deep within our Truth Bunker upon viewing this Researchmentalism—but I could’ve sworn I heard his distinctive voice in our ODM cafeteria late last night in the afterhours as I was getting a midnight snack.