Archive for October, 2019

Preaching our Gospel of Love by Offending All not Born like Us

October 31, 2019

73014731_2557065507673920_78195875398025216_n
We’re so sick of those gutless-grace girlymen half gospels that preach “love love love love.” The True Gospel should be offensive and should offend everyone but us. How dare anyone offend us and our comfortable American values! They have no right to…you’re the ones who need to change not us. Where in the Prophets does it ever call for others to hold us accountable for following culture rather than God…where just where?
Besides that we’re only speaking our truth in love against all not like us:
“Four states still have no hate crime laws on the books. Many others have inadequate protections that fail to cover all threatened classes of hate crimes or don’t adequately equip law enforcement to respond to and report bias-related incidents. ” What some interpret as hatred is really love. These laws are useless and only provide the state more to impose on people who are not conventional. They want more liberal-speak than the truth.
Won’t someone think of us poor innocent Discernmentalists? Why must everyone who hates our Hard Truth  offend us?:

There Is No Such Thing…

October 31, 2019

jeffress-swbts

There is no such thing as a Christian yoga studio. Yoga poses are paying homage to the god of that particular pose. Christians only pay homage to the trinity; Father, Son, Holy Spirit – anything else is idolatry.

There is no such thing as a Christian: nation; bakeshop; restaurant; store; capitalism; socialism; economics; sidewalk; business; traffic-light; war; army; stoplight; candlemaker; library; cakemaker; whole-taker; art; school; civilization; government; faker; tentmaker; actor; movie; play; etc. etc. either. Only people are Christians—so no need to insist on any of these things being “more Christian.”

Martin Luther

“The Christian shoemaker does his duty not by putting little crosses on the shoes, but by making good shoes, because God is interested in good craftsmanship.”― Martin Luther

 

The Gay Agenda ReExposed

October 31, 2019

73388496_10219615390351960_460497855082135552_n

Now in movie form the Gay Agenda has been re-exposed!

1 Out Of 3 Discernmentalists Agree Origen More Faithful To The Whole Bible Than JMac(PBUH)

October 29, 2019

7

Censored for graphic imagery

In a vote between 3 Discernmentalists—1 out of 3 agreed that Origen would be more faithful to the whole Bible if he indeed took Matthew 19:12 literally than JMac (PBUH). In fact he was overheard stating: “Anyone who doesn’t follow Matthew 19:12 literally is playing games with the Scriptures. I’m serious. I’m not joking. I mean it. . Be real and stop your deception. Either follow the whole Bible or leave the Christian faith. I do not want a cut and paste faith. That is no faith at all.

However 2 of the other 3 were unconvinced as:

2 Answers

active oldest votes This has been debated, so no one knows for sure. The consensus of the scholars seems to be that this was a malicious rumor about him, possibly started by Demetrios, the Bishop of Alexandria, a prosecutor of Origen. John McGuckin’s Westminster Handbook to Origen states that someone who interpreted the Gospels so allegorically would be unlikely to have interpreted Matthew 19:12 so literally and that in Origen’s commentary on Matthew, he himself derides the literal interpretation of the eunuch and says only an idiot would consider that. Origen doesn’t use the word “idiot,” but you can read his derision for the interpretation in his Commentary on Matthew 15.1-5.

The castration story comes from the historian Eusebius of Caesarea. Eusebius, the church historian who lived a generation after Origen, devotes nearly all of Book VI of his Ecclesiastical History to the life of Origen. While some scholars have cast doubt on the reliability of this source due to the author’s obvious admiration for his subject and the work’s loving hagiographical tone, most do not believe these factors are reason for doubting Eusebius’ reports. However, why take Eusebius’ account over Origen’s own words? A nice account can be found here: http://houseoftheinklings.blogspot.com/2006/09/on-origen.html

Other Discernmentalists are still being polled—stay tuned or not for the final results.

We Forbid Women from Praying

October 28, 2019

anti-women

Why because we said so but also because some Puritans said so:

We mean it…we’re not joking. “We have seen that the New Testament very clearly requires that only men lead in public prayer. It is worth our further noting that there are no recorded examples anywhere in Scripture of women leading in public prayer (such as 1 Corinthians 11:5- But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head–it is the same as having her head shaved.)
even though they were present. Prior to the law of Moses it appears that the head of the household would lead in worship and “call upon the name of the Lord”. None of this should lead us to undervalue or demean in any way Scripture’s commendation of the private prayers offered by many a Hannah, Anna and others continuing “in supplications and prayers night and day” (1 Tim. 5:5). The presence of women at prayer meetings and public gatherings is vital, for we all join together in prayer, though one only leads. We read in Acts 1:14 that the apostles “all continued in one accord with prayer and supplication, with the women”. There is an honoured mention for the presence of the faithful women, but we see from verses 24 to 25 that while it is said “they prayed”, that is, the whole company, it was evidently one of the apostles who led in prayer. In Acts 4:24 there was a gathering for prayer and “they lifted up their voice to God with one accord”, although it must clearly have been but one person who led in prayer. The point here is that although one was the mouth of the congregation, they all with one accord entered into it and made the prayer their own. “And when they had prayed, the place was shaken where they were assembled together; and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost” (v. 31). None of what we have noticed upon the point of male leadership is in any way intended to exclude women from this type of participating, nor from the power and blessing that may come from public prayer. What women must not do is to lead in public prayer.”—M. A. Vogan

Now there are some who are too Soft and compromising on our HARD Truth but our Complementarian Doctrine is Clear: women are forbidden from praying in church or publicly. In fact we Discernmentalists take this a step further and forbid women from praying at any time (even silently) just in case they slip up and accidentily pray out loud in front of men and therefore lead men in prayer usurping the authority of their HeadShip. We hope this clears things up and that all get Right with us first for the End is nigh.

I swear (not in an unbiblical way) the Law of the gospel I preach is not something any man made up,

Dr. I. Todyaso, Pator-Teacher; Master Discernmentalist; Truth Warrior-Extrodinare; Instructor-Correcter of our Cyber-Brethern in Arms

Your Typical Baptists aka Heretics

October 27, 2019

We would like to thank Biblical Christianity for teaching us these warning signs to aid us in the Truth War against all those whose Doctrines aren’t Pure enough:ls

  • A monergist synergist
  • A Pelagian Calvinist
  • A sola scriptura tradition-worshiper
  • A 66-book Apocryphalist
  • A monotheist idolater

We know that this fits the definition of a typical Baptist to a tee as they corrupt our Truth War Doctrine by teaching such horrible things as:

God saves any person who responds to the Gospel.

God is Sovereign yet is not the author of evil.

We believe in the Bible as laid out in our Distinctives (traditions).

The King James is one of many translations used in our churches.

Now we commend you to our further Researchmentalism on this very subject:

Baptists may be Calvinists, but they are not, strictly speaking, Reformed.”

“What is so bizarre is that eternal security is like article I of Baptist faith, but Anabaptists are classic Arminians –no security for them!…confused and confusing, even to themselves. Baptists want to be free-willers to choose salvation if and when they’re ready, but once they’ve made their ‘decision’ and are saved through Believer’s Baptism, they want to pass the buck to God to keep them that way. Baptists, with their muddled theology, think they should have the best of both worlds, so to speak. I find that very annoying.”–Sharon Whitley

Only the Truly Reformed by the Purity of our Doctrines shall be saved,

I. Todyaso

 

Spurgeon Exposed: Taught The Heresy That Baptism Saves!

October 26, 2019

How dare you attack Spurgeon..hypocrite!”—Bible Berean

Bible Berean—how dare you attack us who attack Spurgeon who attacked John MacArthur (PBUH) who attacked Beth Moore. This is the Truth War after all and we must attack all those who attack our Truth as clearly and plainly laid out in the Holy MacArthur Study Bible (PBUI). Now we who are True Bible-Believing Discernmentalists know that Spurgeon was a heretic as per our Clear Teachings. We also know that Spurgeon taught the error that Baptism Saves which is the Catholic heresy of Baptismal Regeneration:

“Please observe that I did not make the text. Perhaps, if I had made it, I should have left out that piece about baptism; but I have had no hand in making the Bible, I am obliged to take God’s Word as I find it, and here I read these words of our Lord Jesus Christ, ‘He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.’ ‘Do not dwell on the baptism,’ says one; ‘leave that out.’ That is what you say, my dear Sir; I cannot see your face, but I do not believe that you are my master. My Master is the Lord who taught holy men to write this Book, and I can only go by the Book; the Book has the baptism in it, so I must stick to the truth as it is in the Book: ‘He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.’” (emp. added).

Now we know that Baptism doesn’t save–why because the Ways of our Master the Pope of all  Truth over the Truth War John MacArthur himself (PBUH) said so! Also James White said so as he corrected Martin Luther the father of Protestantism and  Sola Scriptura 500 years after the Reformation:

“If you feel a communion that replaces the grace of God with sacraments, mediators, and merit, can be properly called “Christian,” then please go ahead and use the phrase. But please understand that if a person shares the perspective of the epistle to the churches of Galatia they will have to hold to a different understanding, and hence may not be as quick to use the term “Christian” of such a person.”—James White (4-6-95, p. 2 and 5-4-95, p. 2)

I pointed out (surely he was aware, as a student of the history of theology) that Martin Luther believed in baptismal regeneration and the Real Presence in the Eucharist. I set out to prove — by means of an elaborate but very solid chain of logical deductive reasoning, using White’s own remarks as a premise — that by White’s own stated reasoning, Luther would not be a Christian.

Remember Baptism now saves you*,

Don Jobson

*-1 Peter 3:21 New Revised Standard Version (NRSV): “21 And baptism, which this prefigured, now saves you—not as a removal of dirt from the body, but as an appeal to God fora]”>[a] a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, with angels, authorities, and powers made subject to him.

Has Brannon Howse Lost His SPINE?

October 26, 2019

DE9B3YCVYAAJaLS

Brannon Howse has turned against the Pope of all Truth (PBUH) as seen in this video—how dare he attack the Only True Living Teacher of God’s Word today like that!:

Oh the horrors as Brannon under John MacArthur (PBUH)’s leadership could’ve single handedly crushed the Socialist Justice Warrior Movement once and for all as Brannon believes:

Anti-Christian bigotry causes poverty! Separation of Church and State causes poverty! Liberal-leaning social engineers cause poverty! Brilliant! The man should have the Adam Smith Chair of Economics at some prestigious university…say…Liberty University or Bob Jones. Thank you Brannon Howse… (Source)

Brannon’s friend Jan Markel, a broadcaster with Olive Tree Ministries, also seems to think that our Pope (PBUH) is somehow involved with the New World Order. And even though the description of one of her radio shows on Howse’ site clearly misquotes the Pope (PBUH)—Jan has stated that Social Justice=Marxism.

One of our fellow Discernmentalists quipped:

Brannon’s clumsy, half-baked crusade to uncover imaginary collusion between a well-respected, rock solid Christian apologist with a 25 year track record of Gospel ministry and an accused Islamic terrorist sympathizer is bad enough. Compounding the problem is him mass blocking an entire online community of believers pleading with  him to step back and reevaluate the foolishness he has presented. Worse still is him hiding his dispute with a ministry that on the one hand he uses for his credibility, but on the other hand, disparages the men associated with that ministry. Such vacillating behavior reveals some troubling character issues that need to be addressed.

Repent Brannon repent!

Update: We caught our Pope (PBUH) returned to the fold: “I have also quoted John in several of my books.”—-Brannon Howse

Update #2: “I began to be concerned with MacArthur’s continued promotion of men like Mark Dever, Al Mohler, Ligon Duncan and others whom he would invite into his church pulpit.

In 2017, MacArthur’s ministry defended James White after he had an interfaith dialogue in my community with a Muslim Brotherhood, Jew-hating, holocaust-denying, Hitler-defending, Jihadi-preaching Imam by the name of Yasir Qadhi. In fact, in June of 2018, MacArthur invited White to speak at his church and seminary for a week, leaving no question that MacArthur had no issues with those who participate in interfaith dialogue, which is the number one strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood for taking over America.

MacArthur’s compromise on interfaith dialogue, and his continued promotion of social justice warriors Mark Dever, Al Mohler, Ligon Duncan, the [Cultural Marxist] Gospel Coalition and his 2018 appearance once again at “Together For the Gospel” with out-and-proud white privilege promoters and race-baiters John Piper, Matt Chandler, David Platt and others, led me to publicly apologize in my November 2018 book, Marxianity, for ever having promoted John MacArthur.

In this book I warned that John MacArthur had made a clear choice to speak out of both sides of his mouth, to have one foot firmly planted in the progressive evangelical camp, and another within traditional evangelicalism. I openly warned that MacArthur was choosing to sacrifice truth for pragmatic reasons as well as to remain within his “Calvinist camp” of good ol’ boys.”—Brannon Howse

Final Update: JMac (PBUH) back to believing capitalism.

 

 

 

JMac (PBUH) Slips Again: Holds To Prosperity Doctrine…

October 25, 2019

 

4

We can’t believe it—clearly we’re in the Last Days. How can one who knows so much about the Bible via a lens of the modernistic hermeneutic of a neo-Platonic dualistic Paulian Augustinian Reformational logically Aristotelian cosmological Calvinistic literalistic Premillennial Dispensationalist culturally American Conservative Fundamentaist Solo Scripturalist interpretation of scriptures not understand this CLEAR TEACHING:

2 Corinthians 2:17- Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, as those sent from God.

Steve Camp has caught JMac (PBUH) in the very act of practicing the Abomination of the extra-heretical Prosperity doctrine. For shame—for shame—our Research Robot Monkeys have discernmentalized further acts of this horrible Apostasy:

Back in 2012, we reported on John MacArthur’s extravagant income including directing $650,000 per year to his son-in-law Kory Welch for video production. Based on publishing and royalties plus IRS 990 forms for MacArthur’s non-profit corporations, we made the conservative estimate that MacArthur and Welch brought in $1.5 million per year from these ministries.

Now, six years later, the Master’s University has been put on probation by its accrediting agency. They are requiring Welch’s work to be subject to competitive bidding and MacArthur is seeking to comply with their requirement.

We said back in 2012 that this amount of profit from teaching the Word of God is wrong. We repeat it now. God’s servants are not to be greedy, and those who say these amounts and the favored-son nature of  the video contract are merely business-as-usual forget that teaching and preaching and publishing the Word of God is not business-as-usual.

One of many pertinent Scriptures is 2 Corinthians 2:17 placing in opposition “peddling the Word of God” and “sincerity.”

Maybe this is all a bad dream or maybe the Rapture has already happened and we’ve all been Left Behind! This is worse than the time Phil Johnson aka Hugh Jass turned on the Ways of the Master himself. We only hope all get Right with us before the final judgment or else they burn.

Internet Experts on Catholicism declare Pope Francis a Commie

October 24, 2019

quote-a-just-wage-for-the-worker-is-the-ultimate-test-of-whether-any-economic-system-is-functioning-pope-john-paul-ii-84-53-29

Self-proclaimed Internet experts on Catholicism have banded together and denounced Pope Francis as a Red-blooded Commie. Rush Limbaugh (1 such expert on the RCC) who has never read a book on Catholic Social Teaching let alone the Catechism is on record as stating:  “This Is Just Pure Marxism Coming Out Of The Mouth Of The Pope” after Pope Francis preached on income inequality. Other Self-proclaimed Catholic experts have noted there never was  a Pope who preached against capitalism before especially not Pope John Paul II (a Reagan-styled Conservative).

Perhaps if these so called experts on Catholicism had bothered to pick up a book on Catholic Social Teaching they would have read these clearly non-heretical quotes:

7d31a8650e02656bb4df069914d741c6--on-being-pope-francis

Catholic teaching on living wages started in 1891. Pope Leo XIII’s papal letter Rerum Novarum recognized the right of every worker to receive wages sufficient to provide for a family. Pope Pius XI reaffirmed the principle of the need for a living wage, writing in Quadragesimo Anno (1931), In the first place, the worker must be paid a wage sufficient to support him and his family.

The U.S. Catholic bishops gave the need for a living wage priority in their Statement on Church and Social Order (1940):

The first claim of labor, which takes priority over any claim of the owners to profits, respects the right to a living wage. By the term living wage we understand a wage sufficient not merely for the decent support of the workingman himself but also of his family. A wage so low that it must be supplemented by the wage of wife and mother or by the children of the family before it can provide adequate food, clothing, and shelter together with essential spiritual and cultural needs cannot be regarded as a living wage. Furthermore, a living wage means sufficient income to meet not merely the present necessities of life but those of unemployment, sickness, death, and old age as well.

Opponents have always argued that wage levels should be left to the market. In 1961, in the encyclical Mater et Magistra, Pope John XXIII responded to that claim and proclaimed that a living wage was clearly a justice issue:

We therefore consider it our duty to reaffirm that the remuneration of work is not something that can be left to the laws of the marketplace; nor should it be a decision left to the will of the more powerful. It must be determined in accordance with justice and equity; which means that workers must be paid a wage which allows them to live a truly human life and to fulfill their family obligations in a worthy manner.

Pope John Paul II went further. In On Human Work (1981) he wrote that payment of living wages was a critical criterion for determining the legitimacy of the entire economic system:

Hence in every case a just wage is the concrete means of verifying the whole socioeconomic system and, in any case, of checking that it is functioning justly. It is not the only means of checking, but it is a particularly important one and in a sense the key means.

In their 1986 letter, Economic Justice for All, the U.S. Catholic bishops reaffirmed that payment of just wages is the initial step in combating poverty and put the issue squarely on the social justice agenda for the American economy: The first line of attack against poverty must be to build and sustain a healthy economy that provides employment opportunities at just wages for all adults who are able to work. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, refusing to pay just wages, even if allowed by law, is a violation of the Seventh Commandment.

Though we being True Conservative Bible-Believing Internet Calvinist Discernmentalists wouldn’t recommend it as our Most Illustrious Most Holy Most Inerrant Most Infallible Pope of all Truth of the Truth War and the #1 Expert on Catholicism even more so than all the Anti-Christ Popes combined John MacArthur (PBUH) has taught us:

The fact is, the most formidable relentless, and deceptive enemy in Satan’s long war on the truth has been Roman Catholicism. It’s an apostate, corrupt, heretical, false Christianity – a thinly veiled façade for the kingdom of Satan.”

But according to all our Important Researchmentalism (Ana)Baptists are worse:

Calvinists in the time of the Reformation considered the Anabaptists to be more dangerous and threatening to the Reformation and to true Biblical Christianity than Romanism.